Discussions – 6.3 | Implementation & Consultancy Partners – AIiHC ORG

Toggle Side Panel

Home
About Us

Our Story
Community

1. Stakeholder Connect

1.1 Clinician's forum

1.2 Healthcare leaders

1.3 AI Innovators & Developers

1.4 Policy, Regulatory experts

1.5 IT & Infrastructure Management

1.6 Industry & Solution Providers

1.7 Patients & Caregivers

2. AI Adoption cycle

2.1 Exploration and Readiness

2.2 Implementation & Integration

2.3 Monitoring & Optimization

2.4 Future & Emerging AI

3. Ethics & Governances

3.1 Ethical AI & Fairness

3.2 Data Governance & Security

3.3 Regulatory Landscape

3.4 Standards and Best Practices

4. Clinical Domains

4.1 Medical AI

4.2 Surgical AI

4.3 Diagnostic Imaging AI

4.4 Primary Care & Family Medicine

4.5 Medical and Behavioural Health

4.6 Drug Discovery & Pharma

4.7 Public & Population Health

4.8 Hospital System Operations

5. Academics

5.1 Research Project Collaboration

5.2 Grant & Funding Opportunities

5.3 Clinical Trials & Academic Studies

5.4 University & Institution Connect

5.5 Research Methodologies & Tools

5.6 Education & Workforce development

6. Industry Exchange

6.1 AI Application Vendors

6.2 Platform & Infrastructure Providers

6.3 Implementation & Consultancy Partners

6.4 MedTech, Pharma & Device Innovators

6.5 Responsible Industry Practices
Discussions
Contact us

Sign in

Search for:

Home
About Us
Community
Discussions
Contact us

Search for:

6.3 | Implementation & Consultancy Partners

Public Industry Exchange

Public Industry Exchange

Active 3 months ago

Purpose:
To provide a space for neutral implementation partners — companies that don’t just sell AI... View more

Public Industry Exchange

Organizer:

Organized by

Group Description

Purpose:
To provide a space for neutral implementation partners — companies that don’t just sell AI tools, but help hospitals evaluate, procure, deploy, validate, and sustain AI responsibly.

Description:
This group is for consultancies, service providers, and independent validation organizations that guide hospitals through the AI adoption journey.
Unlike product vendors, these companies focus on process expertise: strategy, workflow adaptation, evidence-building, and change management.
Examples: Romion Health, Deloitte Health AI practices, Accenture Health, MedPerf collaborations, CRO validation partners.

Intended Use:
Share lessons learned from supporting hospitals with AI adoption.Provide frameworks for procurement, governance, and evaluation.Discuss training and workforce readiness programs.Collaborate with vendors and hospitals to ensure evidence-based implementation.

Limitations:
Strict no product promotion (they must avoid acting as resellers).Cannot endorse or “push” specific vendor products.Proprietary client details must remain confidential — only generalized lessons allowed.Focus must remain on responsible process support, not consulting sales pitches.

Key Activities:
Posting neutral case lessons (e.g., “Challenges we saw when a mid-sized hospital adopted 3 AI tools at once”).Sharing procurement templates and checklists.Hosting Q&A with clinicians about implementation hurdles.Bringing in multidisciplinary best practices (governance, change management, IT readiness).

Potential Users:
Implementation consultancies (Romion Health, Accenture, Deloitte, PwC Health AI teams).Independent validation networks (Health AI Register, MedPerf/MLCommons).Hospital project managers working with external implementation partners.Researchers interested in studying adoption pathways.Clinicians who want to learn how hospitals structure implementation programs.

Possible Discussions:
“What governance model works best for AI steering committees in hospitals?”.“How do you evaluate multiple vendors fairly in procurement?”.“Lessons learned from training radiologists and nurses to trust AI outputs.”.“How can independent registries like Health AI Register support transparency?”.“What role should consultancies play in post-market surveillance?”

Other Important Notes:
This group is crucial for bridging the gap between theory and practice — making AI adoption safe, responsible, and efficient.It connects strongly to Pillar 2 (AI Adoption Journey) since these partners often help hospitals through those exact steps.It also links to Pillar 3 (Foundational Principles) (ethics, data governance, regulation).Many hospitals may rely on these partners — so having them here adds real-world expertise for clinicians and administrators in AIiHC.

Leave Group

Are you sure you want to leave ?

Cancel Confirm

Subgroups
Feed
Members
Documents
Discussions

All Discussions
Sorry, there were no discussions found.

You must be logged in to create new discussions.

© 2025 - AI Healthcare Community

Disclaimer
Rules And Regulation
Community Guidelines
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy

Report

There was a problem reporting this post.

Harassment Harassment or bullying behavior

Inappropriate Contains mature or sensitive content

Misinformation Contains misleading or false information

Offensive Contains abusive or derogatory content

Suspicious Contains spam, fake content or potential malware

Other

Report note

Block Member?

Please confirm you want to block this member.

You will no longer be able to:

See blocked member's posts
Mention this member in posts
Invite this member to groups
Message this member
Add this member as a connection

Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.

Report

You have already reported this .