Purpose: To facilitate discussions on the principles, design, and strategies to ensure AI is... View more
PublicEthics & Governance
Organizer:
Organized by
Group Description
Purpose: To facilitate discussions on the principles, design, and strategies to ensure AI is fair, unbiased, trustworthy, and aligns with human values in healthcare.
Description: This group delves into the moral and philosophical considerations of AI, addressing issues like algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and the impact of AI on patient autonomy and equity. It’s about designing and using AI responsibly.
Intended Use: For members to explore ethical frameworks for AI, discuss methods for identifying and mitigating bias, and collaboratively develop guidelines for human oversight and accountability in AI-assisted decisions.
Limitations: This group focuses on the ethical principles and design approaches. While examples from clinical practice might be used to illustrate ethical points, detailed clinical case discussions belong in “AI in Clinical & Operational Domains” (4.0). Not a legal forum for individual cases.
Key Activities:
Debating different ethical frameworks for AI in healthcare (e.g., beneficence, non-maleficence, justice).
Sharing and critiquing methods for bias detection and mitigation in AI models and datasets.
Discussing approaches to achieving transparency and explainability in “black box” AI.
Exploring models for human oversight and accountability in AI-driven decision-making.
Possible Discussions: “How do we quantify and reduce racial bias in AI diagnostic tools?”, “Strategies for explaining complex AI decisions to patients and clinicians,” “The role of ‘human in the loop’ for critical AI applications in surgery.”
Other Important Notes: This group is at the forefront of ensuring AI serves humanity ethically.
Please note:
This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin.
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.